Monday, October 26, 2009

The 3 Biggest Money Mistakes You Can Make


By: Roshawn Watson




Not all money decisions are equal. It is certainly possible to recover from some small money missteps without too much difficulty; however, there are some money mistakes that you will regret for years to come. Here are three of the biggest money mistakes you can make.

Borrowing on Your Home Equity

Perhaps this is a mute point for most due to the mortgage crunch; however, real estate is showing signs of recovery. The $8,000 tax credit is prompting many to take the plunge into home ownership for the first time. Additionally, home prices are returning, which is great news. However, in the midst of the celebration, the old admonishment still holds true: leave that equity in your home alone. By far, one of the most common reason to tap home equity is to “pay off” consumer debt through a debt consolidation loan. For the vast majority of those with consumer debt, the debt is not the problem but rather a symptom of poor financial management (or an emergency that wasn’t prepared for). Sure that’s a hard stance, but it is also true. What’s important is that we realize that one generally cannot borrow his way out of financially trouble. The debt only makes the problem worse. That’s exactly what happens with home equity lines of credit (HELOCs).

Lenders tout HELOCs as a way to pay off credit cards, student loan debt, and other consumer debt. Even some personal finance journalists promote these loans stating that you can get these loans at a lower interest rate than other loans, plus the interest you pay is tax-deductible. Americans have bought the goods too. According to SMR Research and Freddie Mac, we have cashed out more than a whopping $2 trillion between 2002-2005. It is always surprising how many people will borrow on their homes to pay Visa, Mastercard, and American “Excess.”

Unfortunately, there is a catch. Brittain associates reports that nearly two-thirds of people who borrowed against their homes to pay for credit card debts had run up more debt in two years. Instead of solving the problem, the HELOC consolidation only served to move the debt from an unsecured loan (i.e. credit card) to a loan secured by your home.

I wouldn’t even set up a HELOC for “emergencies.” Instead, I would use an emergency fund: three to six months worth of expenses in a money market or savings account. It wouldn’t be horrible to go up to eight months. Sure this is boring, but it is also responsible. Additionally, many people don’t realize that many lenders will close your HELOC at the first sign of financial trouble (i.e. missed payment), so it’s not a good financial buffer anyway since it can be closed precisely when you need the cash.

Borrowing on your 401K

Another big mistake is borrowing on your 401K. At some point, we all need to retire. If you tap your account, not only will your money not grow, but you can be subject to severe penalties and taxes. Over eighty percent of American workers with 401K accounts have the option of borrowing on their retirement account, and twenty percent of participants do just that according to the Investment Company Institute.

Many of those who do borrow on their 401K accounts consider themselves pretty savvy. After all, the interest paid back to the account is their money, so they are effectively paying interest to themselves. The problem arises if they cannot pay the money back, for example if they get fired or lose their job. Often one will have to repay the money within weeks or the loan is counted as a “premature distribution.” In this case, one would have to pay taxes on the money withdrawn from the 401K at their present tax bracket, which for many is about 25% plus get a pretty hefty penalty. For many people, they end up losing 40% of the money. That’s obviously a bad deal. Also, by borrowing, they’re putting their retirement at risk. It just not worth it unless you are facing bankruptcy or foreclosure.

Stretching to Buy A Home

Perhaps this is the most difficult not to partake in because purchasing a home is such an emotional purchase for so many people.

It is almost as if the lender and real estate broker conspire against you, so that you will purchase a home that costs more than you can afford. Of course, when you purchase a more expensive house, the real estate agent gets a bigger commission and the lender racks up more interest and fees. Indeed, 40% of homebuyers are overextended. This means that the sum of the principal, interest, taxes, and insurance exceed 28% of your gross income. This is particularly troublesome because this means that there is less money for investing for retirement, college funds, vacations, eating out, giving, maintenance on the house, etc.

Don’t mortgage your future by becoming house poor. That dream home will become a nightmare once Murphy comes to visit you.

Lastly, if you like this post, please subscribe (upper left-hand corner), click here to get my eBook FREE, and Propel it, Stumble it, and tag it on Delicious.



Related Posts


Image Credit: Gravestone

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Uncommon Money News (Vol 74)


By: Roshawn Watson

Brand New Post Coming Monday Oct 26:
The 3 Biggest Money Mistakes You Can Make

In preparing to write my posts, I often come across noteworthy and sometimes bizarre financial and business news. Below are links to some of these sites. Enjoy!

To my readers: I am so honored by your support. Thank you for reading, subscribing, and for voting for articles from this site on social bookmarketing sites such as stumbleupon, reddit, delicious, digg, propeller, twitter, and yahoo buzz. Together, we are telling thousands of the importance of financial literacy. I absolutely could not do it without you. You are vital this this site, and I appreciate your help so much! Thanks.

Posts Of the Week

Latest bank fee is for paying off credit card on time every month

79.9 percent rate targets credit-challenged

Business

Latest bank fee is for paying off credit card on time every month

BofA to charge annual fees on some credit cards

Burdened by Defaults, Bank of America Misses Forecast

Where The Monetizable Clicks Are: Digg's New Ads

79.9 percent rate targets credit-challenged

Wall Street Bonuses Likely To Remain Bigger Than Ever


Economy

China's Super rich bounce back with a vengeance

U.S. Stocks Rally as Dow Hits 10,000 for First Time in Year

Initial jobless claims in surprise drop

Entertainment Money News

Wild Things is King with $32.5 Million

Madoff's Montauk mansion sells for $9.4 million

Rehab for the rich and famous

Jon Gosselin Ordered to Give Back $180,000

Offbeat Money News

Woman flashes $27,000 at Mass. bar, gets robbed

Top-paying jobs

Friday, October 16, 2009

Money Down the Toilet for Security

By: Roshawn Watson

Most extended warranties are a waste of money for the purchaser and a profit center for the issuer, yet consumers still flock to them. Unfortunately, the extra security provided by the warranty comes with a hefty price tag.

Extended Warranties are Abundant

Sometimes it seems that you can obtain an extended warranty for just about anything. They’re certainly widely available for most cars (new and used), appliances, cell phones, computers and other electronics. They are big business too. Consider that in 2006, consumers spent an estimated $1.6 billion on extended warranties. Functionally, getting an extended warranty is purchasing insurance for a product.

The problem is that these extended warranties are just a waste of consumers’ money for the vast majority of items. The companies issuing the extended warranties are banking on the fact that consumers probably won’t even use the extended warranty, and they’re right. The Consumer Reports National Research Center documents the ownership experiences of millions of consumers for thousands of products. This is how Consumer Reports knows which brands are more repair-prone than others. Anyway, their research shows that most products seldom break within the Extended Warranty window -- typically three years -- and that when electronics and appliances do break, the repair often costs about the same as the cost of the warranty. Additionally, the warranty departments are huge profit centers for the issuing companies. Extended warranties can reap a whopping 50% margin or higher, which is often well more than the profit on the product being sold. That profit is made off of consumer’s desire for security, but it is just not worth it.

Just Say No
It’s their bottom lines that companies are thinking about when they are pushing those extended warranties not your happiness with their product. I was upgrading my phone six months ago, and the overall experience was low pressure except for when my salesperson got aggressive because she wanted me to purchase an extended warranty. In the end, I held firm and informed her that I would simply self-insure for the phone. She told me I would live to regret it, which I found comical. The truth is that my repeated refusal to purchase these extended warranties for my cell phones alone has more than paid for the price of several phones. In other words, I’m already ahead of the “warranty game” financially.

There was a time two years ago when I thought that I broke my palm, so I went to Circuit City to replace it. They queried me about fixing my existing one. Interestingly, they told me that even if I had purchased an extended warranty, it would have expired a few months earlier. Recall the expiration of warranties before they can be used is often the case for many consumers, which is why extended warranties are a bad product. Of course, getting that warranty from the presently defunct Circuit City would have given me indigestion too. Fortunately, it all worked out.

I have many other examples, but my point is I cannot think of a single case where I wished I would have purchased an extended warranty. I would have lost money with no added value each time.

A Note About Extended Car Warranties
Interestingly, extended appear to be on the rise. Consider that in 1999 23.5% of car buyers purchased extended warranties, and in 2009, that number has soared to 34.4%. According to the National Automobile Dealers Association, these warranties are an important source of profits for the dealerships and are typically more profitable than selling the new cars themselves. Perhaps even more vexing is that sixty-five percent of the respondents Consumer Reports surveyed said “they spent significantly more for the new-car warranty than they got back in repair savings” (WSJ, 2009)

Consider that the next time you’re tempted to waste money on an extended service contract. The better strategy is to 1) purchase quality products and 2) put the money that you were going to spend on the extended warranty into your repair savings. That way, when it is time to repair or replace the product, you will already have money set aside to do it. If you don’t need to repair it, then you’re still ahead.

In short, don’t waste any more of your money on extended warranty. Purchasing one would be the real decision that you would live to regret.
Lastly, if you like this post, please subscribe (upper left-hand corner), click here to get my eBook FREE, and Propel it, Stumble it, and tag it on Delicious.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Uncommon Money News (Vol. 73)


By: Roshawn Watson

In preparing to write my posts, I often come across noteworthy and sometimes bizarre financial and business news. Below are links to some of these sites. Enjoy!



This week, I participated in the Carnival of Financial Planning - Edition #109 hosted by: Military Finance Network. We have the following posts included in this carnival: Should You Buy A House Outright? and The Rich Get Poorer.


To my readers: I am so honored by your support. Thank you for reading, subscribing, and for voting for articles from this site on social bookmarketing sites such as stumbleupon, reddit, delicious, digg, propeller, twitter, and yahoo buzz. Together, we are telling thousands of the importance of financial literacy. I absolutely could not do it without you. You are vital this this site, and I appreciate your help so much! Thanks.


Business News

Another U.S. Bank--One of the "Good Ones"--Ready to Blow?

What Professionals Make (image)

Rupert Murdoch to Internet: It’s War!

Bye Bye Shamu - SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Sold For $2.3 Bill

Studios struggle to rein in movie marketing costs

Goldman Sachs Scandal

This company with $8B in debt and thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions in revenue lost in 2008, is set to pay its highest bonuses in its history, on the rationale that its managers will find other work otherwise. Is this a bank? No, it's a newspaper company.


Comcast may become a partner in Hulu.

Economy

47% will pay no federal income tax?

Detroit: Too broke to bury their dead

Clearly you did not represent the will of the people

Gold sets record high above $1,040 per ounce

Personal bankruptcies hits a 4-year high

Entertainment Money News
Michael Jordan's $7.5 Million pad

Nicolas Cage Owes $6.3 Million in Back Taxes


Other

21 ways to get something for nothing

Image Credit: Kirk W

Friday, October 09, 2009

A Warning to All TightWads


By: Roshawn Watson

Frugality is supposed to be good; however, when taken to an extreme, it can be disastrous. Some have destroyed relationships, become selfish, and lived relatively miserable lives all in the name of saving a buck.

Frugality Is Not the Only Characteristic That’s Important
Frugality is an important proponent of almost any financial plan. As you know, there are only two sides of the money equation: income and expenses. If you have done due diligence to increase your income, then appropriately managing your expenses is a critical factor in your ability to build wealth. Nonetheless, there are other desirable character attributes that one should consider as well, such as generosity and unselfishness. Sometimes a tightwad completely ruins the spirit behind a kind gesture. For example, if the office agrees to go in on a gift together, but when it comes time to collect the funds for the present, the tightwad conveniently “forgets” to bring his money. I definitely know cases where the “money collector” for the gift tires of dealing with excuses and just uses more of her own money to make up for the lack of participation by coworkers who initially agreed to contribute. What’s more unfortunately is that cheap people are often not poor but middle-class instead. Incidently, it's their obsession with pinching pennies that strains their relationships not their lack of funds.
Just recently, I received a gift that looks like it’s been in the bottom of someone’s closet for a few years. Yes it was tacky, and no I don’t feel bad commenting on it. I would never give someone that mess.
The Problem Is Not Frugality

My intention is not to criticize frugality because I think it is inherently a good character trait. I consider myself to be frugal, and there are often misunderstandings as to what frugality really means. Frugality is concerned with trying to obtain added value. A notable distinction of frugality from cheapness is that cheap individuals are focus on saving a buck at the price of quality, relationships, or time. A frugal person may not always buy the cheapest version pair of jeans because the quality may be poor. Instead, the frugal person would look for deals on a pair with the best value and make sure his budget can accommodate the purchase. Similarly, most frugal people I know would not drive across town to save a buck because they value their time (and gas) too much. The stigma of frugality comes when some equate frugality to saving dollars at almost any cost. However, being a miser, stingy, hoarder, and cheap is not the same as being frugal.

Let’s be clear, there is no conflict between generosity and frugality. Some of the most generous people I know are also frugal, and that’s one of the many reasons they have money to give. I know people who will search for deals on quality food and will buy food for both their families and their local food pantry. Contrast that to the person who is so tight with their money that they resort to taking from others. Using the aforementioned office example, the coworkers who didn’t contribute to purchasing a present are taking credit without giving their fair share. Some people will even steal to save a buck. It’s quite unfortunate.

"Frugal" People: Examine Yourself

Somewhere we may have lost our ways under the guise of frugality. We should be concerned if we will barely go out to eat or have fun with others because we’re too cheap. The warning bells should go off if we stock up on napkins and utensils that we stole from the condiment bar at McDonalds. We are not right if we’re “regifting” crappy stuff that we don't want ourselves. Of course, it is incredibly important to be responsible by budgeting for purchases and investing for the future, and eliminating debt if you have it. Indeed, if you have consumer debt, your financial primary concern should be getting rid of it. Nonetheless, it is also important to be a giver, to not steal, and honor your word when you say you’re going to do something. Somewhere in the quest to save a buck, the miserly have lost sight of moral integrity, honor, family, and friendship. Avoiding unnecessary expenditures is admirable; however, when this behavior becomes an obsession, you’re not frugal, you're miserly and may need help. 

Lastly, if you like this article, please subscribe to my FREE email updates or RSS feed (reader), Retweet it, Tipd it, Fark it, Stumble it, and tag it on Delicious. Also, click here to receive my eBook for FREE.

Related Posts

Friday, October 02, 2009

Dangers of Living Paycheck To Paycheck




By: Roshawn Watson

Is there not enough check at the end of your month? Apparently, you're not alone.

Careerbuilder.com hired Harris Interactive to conduct an online survey amongst US workers 18 and older to determine our financial solvency. The results reveal a disturbing trend: 61 percent of workers reported that they usually live paycheck to paycheck just to make ends meet. This marks what appears to be a significant rise over last year's 49% and 2007's 43%. Notably, the trends held true for those with incomes higher than $100,000 as well. Thirty percent of workers with salaries of $100,000 or more report that they live paycheck to paycheck, up from 21% in 2008.

Savings and Investments Suffer Too
The effects of the recession can be felt in the households' bottom lines, and many have resorted to dipping into savings as a means of coping with dwindling incomes, often precipitated by job losses and salary declines. Although the survey did not ask what percentage of respondents dipped into existing savings and investments, the survey did reveal that twenty one percent of workers say that they have reduced their 401 (k) investing or personal savings just to make it. Twenty three percent of respondents with salaries at least $100,000 annually also reported to have decreased 401 (k) contributions, which likely indicates that those with higher salaries (i.e. salary over $100K) were not financially insulated from the troubled economy or that they feared investing in such a volatile market. Additionally, many reported difficulty saving anything at all. Thirty-six percent of respondents said that they were not contributing to any retirement accounts at all, which is up from 31% in 2008. One-third (33%) of respondents don't save anything from month to month, up from 25% in 2008. Thirty percent of respondents save between $51-$100 monthly while 16% save $50 or less monthly, meaning that nearly half of those who do manage to save are not putting away much.

Some Thoughts on "Dipping" into savings
Although the survey suggests going into savings and investments may be relatively common practice, it is typically ill-advisable. If this occurs habitually, one can end up with little to no money in the end.

The practice of dipping into savings is essentially robbing Peter to save Paul, and when it's your savings, you are Peter!

Although the function of the emergency fund is to place a buffer between you and Murphy, it is not there to avoid dealing with financial problems. What's quite unfortunate is that dipping into savings often masks a real financial problem thereby allowing one to stay in denial while his finances are depleted. For example, if you have a career crisis (i.e. underemployment), supplementing your income with savings may keep the woofs at bay temporarily, but you will still need to address your income problem. Otherwise, what are you going to do when the savings are gone. To be fair, when facing serious financial hardship tapping an emergency fund and even cashing in some liquid investments may be the only saving grace.

Suspending or Decreasing Savings and Investments
Another issue that the survey dealt with decreasing savings or investments. A general rule of thumb is to invest 15% of your gross income after becoming debt-free. Although such consistent investing, over the long-term, is one of the best ways to build wealth, there are definitely situations where you simply cannot continue at the same rate. Examples are if you have a job loss, a large emergency expense, or if you have a reasonable expectation of an emergency in the future (i.e. the birth of a child or job loss). One question that the survey doesn't appear to address was what percentage of respondents actually decreased savings and investments due to actual financial hardship precipitated by the recession? With sensationalistic emphasis on negative economic news by the media, it is certainly likely that some decreased investments out of fear of losing money rather than out of necessity.
Although it is reasonable to be scared, the knee-jerk reaction to suspend (or
diminish) investments while the Dow is plummeting is the very reason why some
investors missed the whopping 45.7% upswing we have experienced since March.
In fact, in the third quarter alone, both the Dow and the S&P 500 index returned 15 percent. It was the Dow's best quarter in nearly 11 years. The point is if you must suspend investments or savings to prevent financial havoc, that's fine, but to do so out primarily out of fear-based speculation can cause investors to end up on the losing side.

Overall, the survey results suggests that the majority (61%) of us are living on the edge financially. This supports previous data stating that most Americans are just one paycheck or two away from ruin. Interestingly, a sizable percentage of those with incomes of at least $100,000 annually were also in the same predicament. As expected, respondents tapped their savings and suspended investments to account for economic hardships. These results surely highlight the need for budgeting. Of course, that's little comfort to those who are presently out of work or who make very little; however, for the rest of us, we must make sure that during times of plenty that we are acting responsibly with our money.

Lastly, if you like this post, please subscribe (see upper right-hand corner), Mixx it, Propel it, Stumble it, and tag it on Delicious. Also, click here to get my eBook FREE.